I'm mainly in charge of The Doc & I's LoveFilm DVD selections. I try to be fair about this and keep Doc C supplied with films he might actually enjoy but I do order stuff I know he'll hate, but that I want to watch when he's doing something else. Yesterday when I got home "Rent" (IMDB) was on the door mat, a title solidly in the latter category so I made a cup of tea, got comfy on the sofa and hit play.
The plot is essentially a re-working of "La Boheme" set in the late 1980's, in New York. The central issues are the relationships of a group of friends a who are effected in varying degrees by drug dependency and AIDS.
To be honest I didn't know very much more than that about the show, other than it's huge popularity, and so it was mostly the strong cast that sold it to me. I loved Idina Menzel when I saw her as Elpheba in "Wicked" and so I was keen to see her as Maureen in "Rent" because that was the role that really established her on Broadway. She's joined in the film version by most of the original stage cast, including her husband Taye Diggs. All of the cast have great voices and the songs are really technically challenging (At least that's what the Doc told me, and he knows about that type of thing), you may well find it enjoyable to watch simply as a master class of singing.
The score is very strong, and I liked most of the songs, although I'll warn you that the opening song has been stuck firmly in my head for 24 hours. It's proven impossible to get rid of, but equally impossible to remember the lyrics to correctly, so it's just "Five hundred twenty-five thousand six hundred minutes. Blah, blah, blah..." on constant repeat, with an occasional "How about Love?" thrown in to break things up a bit.
So I liked the songs, I liked the cast, I liked the costumes, I liked the ridiculously nice slum they live in, I liked New York, I liked the 80s but there was something I didn't like. Unfortunately it was the characters.
As you gather immediately from the title, no one has any money with which to pay their rent and they are under threat of eviction. Initially I assumed there was some very good reason why they couldn't pay their rent, maybe it was really prohibitively expensive, but then I realised they just didn't want to, so by the end I was muttering, why don't they just pay the bloody rent? Get a job, earn some money and pay the rent. Finally one of them does, and he's disgusted with himself for selling out.
The drug addiction and AIDS depicted are both, fortunately, those very photogenic kind that don't stop anyone from doing whatever they want to do, with the exception of working for a living. It must be so tragic to be forced to live a hugely hedonistic life, in an exciting vibrant city, surrounded by a close knit community of loving friends, but not have any sort of a work ethic. Essentially all of the characters seemed to be having a great time, but then they really revel in whinging about it in great detail. This may sound like a flippant assessment, but that is I think what I found most annoying about the whole thing. You have these beautiful beautiful people with glowing skin, glossy hair and perfect teeth, they look so healthy and happy. Heroin addiction (It's not specifically named, but hello what is Mimi's candle for?) and AIDS are life changing, but here they feel incidental.
To sum up their attitude I would like to quote from a very good review of "Ghost World" that I recently read on Cinema de Merde, and Scott has very kindly said I may use it here.
The song "Turn My Way" on New Order's Get Ready album goes “I don't want to be like other people are, down want to own a key, don't want to wash my car, don't want to have to work like other people do. I want it to be free. I want it to be true.” This lyric sums up a lot of what I see in the attitudes toward life of people of my generation [I'm 37] and those born after me; this feeling of: “Hello? I am so very special and unique that I shouldn't have to hold a normal JOB. I, who alone see through all the bullshit to comprehend the true essence of life, must follow my own personal muse and everyone else should a) pay for it, and b) feel glad to act as recipients of my inherent brilliance.”
Look around. Since the late 60s all the movies, music, books, and everything else is all filled with messages about what a special little snowflake you are and how you have to follow your heart and blaze your own path. The majority of movies are full of adulation for those who “break the rules.” Now more than ever messages are everywhere about a) how being a celebrity is the highest state of human achievement possible, and b) you too will be a star, it's just a matter of time before someone sees the TRUE GENIUS within your soul.
Thank you Scott! Mr Telek is writing about a totally different film here, and he hasn't yet expressed an opinion on "Rent" so he may well totally disagree with me. I do feel that the passage above explains perfectly the ethos that the central characters in "Rent" live their fictional lives by, and it is so anti-endearing. It's actually quite frightening to read the rave reviews on IMDB or YouTube, from people gushing about how much they identify with the characters.
One storyline that is mentioned, but thankfully not depicted, is the killing of a dog "...An Akita named Evita...". Angel is paid a large amount of cash for killing the dog by a neighbour who complains about the noise it makes (although apparently Akitas are in reality virtually silent), and this is supposed to be really funny. It turns out later that this dog belonged to Benny, the landlord/ex-friend of the central group. I ended up feeling really sorry for him, which is I am sure not the idea.
In all I'm glad I saw it, because the talent of the cast is phenomenal but it's ironic how hard they must have worked to appear in a show about a bunch of total slackers. I'm also so very glad this was a musical because with out decent dancing and some great songs I would have been so annoyed and seriously bored by the end of it.
Recent Comments